life now and then: a meditation in two parts
I wander'd lonely as a cloud
That floats on high o'er vales and hills
When all at once I saw a crowd,
A host, of golden daffodils;
Beside the lake, beneath the trees,
Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.
Continuous as the stars that shine
And twinkle on the Milky Way,
They stretch'd in never-ending line
Along the margin of a bay:
Ten thousand saw I at a glance,
Tossing their heads in sprightly dance.
The waves beside them danced; but they
Out-did the sparkling waves in glee:
A poet could not but be gay,
In such a jocund company:
I gazed -- and gazed -- but little thought
What wealth the show to me had brought:
For oft, when on my couch I lie
In vacant or in pensive mood,
They flash upon that inward eye
Which is the bliss of solitude;
And then my heart with pleasure fills,
And dances with the daffodils.
-- William Wordsworth
I went to Philadelphia on Friday and it provided much food for thought in two arenas: sociability and history.
To wit: the lack of one and an abundance of the other.
Part 1
Let us begin with the first. At one point on Friday evening, I was prompted to try to taste a particular piece of sushi from someone whose gifts have proven invaluable in ensuring my current situation. Because of this individual's judgment, I was inclined to listen to her encouragement, but in the end declined because I simply cannot abide the consumption of a creature which swims or crawls with a shell upon its back. They're delicious, but something about their flavor just ...
Forgive the digression. I merely wished to say that I found myself declining her vehemence with the following statement: "Look, I already do everything else you tell me to." At her incredulous expostulation, I continued, "I write my resumes the way you tell me to, I apply for the jobs you tell me to, I correspond with people the way you tell me to, you are generally the person who shows me how to be an actual human being. Once in a while, though, I really should grow some balls and think for myself, and I have chosen this occasion to do so."
This sentiment's expression was largely unintentional. Still, the more I think about it, the more I find it to be true. I do require some off-stage prompting with the right lines, the right stance, the right mannerism. I do, in other words, need some help in being some species of actual person.
This I find interesting. It's not a matter of concern because I strongly believe that I do have the right to exist as the kind of person I am. I'm asocial by nature; I enjoy solitude. The roots of this trait may run too deeply to trace -- in spite of previous attempts to do just that -- but the scent of its flowering permeates my life.
I often run across near-satiric paeans to the love of solitude, where asocial behavior is supposedly taken as an indicator of genius; the popular opinion is that the need for time alone serves the desire to perform great works with the utmost of concentration. I draw and I paint and I write, and I do none of these very well. I can't solve the world's problems; that is strictly the province of greater minds than I. Still, I cherish my seclusion. I can think my private thoughts and do my private things and create my private art (such as it is; lately what little I can do has been co-opted by my mother for family needs) and find my private fulfillment on my own terms.
Wordsworth expresses this sentiment beautifully in the poem included at the beginning of this missive. It's too well-known to bother going into any serious analysis, but I want to point out his line about "the inward eye, which is the bliss of solitude," which allows him, in quiet moments, to reflect on the beauty he sees throughout his life and derive an intangible gratification from a single image. This, I think, is a significant portion of the value of reclusiveness.
This stands in stark contrast to my host, whose gregariousness is still a wonder to behold after some years of acquaintance. She's a born charmer. Everywhere we went, she knew someone -- and this was not because this was a planned expedition. For instance, she knew the fellow behind the counter at the Mütter Museum, which hadn't even been considered as a potential destination until I happened to see a magnet emblazoned with its logo on her refrigerator that morning. Or the man who lived next door to her new apartment, whom she accosted by coincidence and involved in deep conversation for several minutes. Or the individual she knew at the Comcast Center who could have taken us to the top of the building, the tallest in Philadelphia -- but didn't because of the lobby show.
The general point is, of course, that there are just some people who were made for others and some people who were made for themselves.
I could go off into a long-winded examination of my phrasing in the previous sentence -- what does it indicate about my beliefs that I choose to refer to people as being "made"? -- but instead I shall end by giving you notice: The lobby show should be considered a segue into Part 2, coming your way tomorrow.
That floats on high o'er vales and hills
When all at once I saw a crowd,
A host, of golden daffodils;
Beside the lake, beneath the trees,
Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.
Continuous as the stars that shine
And twinkle on the Milky Way,
They stretch'd in never-ending line
Along the margin of a bay:
Ten thousand saw I at a glance,
Tossing their heads in sprightly dance.
The waves beside them danced; but they
Out-did the sparkling waves in glee:
A poet could not but be gay,
In such a jocund company:
I gazed -- and gazed -- but little thought
What wealth the show to me had brought:
For oft, when on my couch I lie
In vacant or in pensive mood,
They flash upon that inward eye
Which is the bliss of solitude;
And then my heart with pleasure fills,
And dances with the daffodils.
-- William Wordsworth
I went to Philadelphia on Friday and it provided much food for thought in two arenas: sociability and history.
To wit: the lack of one and an abundance of the other.
Part 1
Let us begin with the first. At one point on Friday evening, I was prompted to try to taste a particular piece of sushi from someone whose gifts have proven invaluable in ensuring my current situation. Because of this individual's judgment, I was inclined to listen to her encouragement, but in the end declined because I simply cannot abide the consumption of a creature which swims or crawls with a shell upon its back. They're delicious, but something about their flavor just ...
Forgive the digression. I merely wished to say that I found myself declining her vehemence with the following statement: "Look, I already do everything else you tell me to." At her incredulous expostulation, I continued, "I write my resumes the way you tell me to, I apply for the jobs you tell me to, I correspond with people the way you tell me to, you are generally the person who shows me how to be an actual human being. Once in a while, though, I really should grow some balls and think for myself, and I have chosen this occasion to do so."
This sentiment's expression was largely unintentional. Still, the more I think about it, the more I find it to be true. I do require some off-stage prompting with the right lines, the right stance, the right mannerism. I do, in other words, need some help in being some species of actual person.
This I find interesting. It's not a matter of concern because I strongly believe that I do have the right to exist as the kind of person I am. I'm asocial by nature; I enjoy solitude. The roots of this trait may run too deeply to trace -- in spite of previous attempts to do just that -- but the scent of its flowering permeates my life.
I often run across near-satiric paeans to the love of solitude, where asocial behavior is supposedly taken as an indicator of genius; the popular opinion is that the need for time alone serves the desire to perform great works with the utmost of concentration. I draw and I paint and I write, and I do none of these very well. I can't solve the world's problems; that is strictly the province of greater minds than I. Still, I cherish my seclusion. I can think my private thoughts and do my private things and create my private art (such as it is; lately what little I can do has been co-opted by my mother for family needs) and find my private fulfillment on my own terms.
Wordsworth expresses this sentiment beautifully in the poem included at the beginning of this missive. It's too well-known to bother going into any serious analysis, but I want to point out his line about "the inward eye, which is the bliss of solitude," which allows him, in quiet moments, to reflect on the beauty he sees throughout his life and derive an intangible gratification from a single image. This, I think, is a significant portion of the value of reclusiveness.
This stands in stark contrast to my host, whose gregariousness is still a wonder to behold after some years of acquaintance. She's a born charmer. Everywhere we went, she knew someone -- and this was not because this was a planned expedition. For instance, she knew the fellow behind the counter at the Mütter Museum, which hadn't even been considered as a potential destination until I happened to see a magnet emblazoned with its logo on her refrigerator that morning. Or the man who lived next door to her new apartment, whom she accosted by coincidence and involved in deep conversation for several minutes. Or the individual she knew at the Comcast Center who could have taken us to the top of the building, the tallest in Philadelphia -- but didn't because of the lobby show.
The general point is, of course, that there are just some people who were made for others and some people who were made for themselves.
I could go off into a long-winded examination of my phrasing in the previous sentence -- what does it indicate about my beliefs that I choose to refer to people as being "made"? -- but instead I shall end by giving you notice: The lobby show should be considered a segue into Part 2, coming your way tomorrow.





